Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5584 14
Original file (NR5584 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S$. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

SJN
Docket No:
5 May 2015

 

wn
wi
co
hs
'
ray
its

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
T6: Secretary of the Navy

subj: REVIEW NAVAL REcoRD OF SD o:v,
xxx-xx- iD

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
(b) 10 U.S.C. 654 (Repeal)
Encl: DD Form 149 with attachments

Case summary
Subject's naval record

Wher

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former
enlisted member of the Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that his “under honorable conditions (General) "
characterization of service, separation program designator (SPD)
“GRA,” narrative reason for discharge “Homosexuality-engaged in,
ttempted to engage in or solicited another to engage in, homosexual
act or acts,” and RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code be
changed per reference (b). He also impliedly requested that the
Separation authority “CNMPC MSG 061915 JUN 92 MILPERSMAN 3630400," be
changed.

 
        

consisting of

       
      

reviewed Petitioner OL GLLOL aller
. and, pursuant to its reguiations, aeterminec

par vrrective action indicated below shoula be taken on
available evidence of cord Documentary material considered
Boara consisted of the enclosures, né ana applicabl]
statutes, regulations, and policies.
3 The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active
duty on 22 June 1989. On 9 March 1992, he received nonjudicial
punishment (NIP) for sodomy. The punishment received was a reduction

in paygrade and restriction. Subsequently, he was administratively
processed for separation by reason of homosexuality. After being

afforded all of his procedural rights, his commanding officer

forwarded his case to the separation authority, who directed that he
receive a general discharge due to homosexuality. He was discharged
on 16 June 1992. At that time he was assigned an RE-4 reentry code.
SIN
Docket No: 5584-14

c. Reference (b) only sets forth the Department of the Navy's
current policies, standards, and procedures for correction of military
records following the “don’t ask, don’t tell” (DADT) repeal of 10
U.S.C. 654. It provides service Discharge Review Boards with the
authority to grant requests to change the characterization of service
to honorable, narrative reason for discharge to “secretarial
authority”, SPD code to “JFF1”, and the reentry code to an immediately
eligible to rgenter category of “RE-1J", when the original discharge
was based solely on DADT or a similar policy in place prior to
enactment of it and there are no aggravating factors in the record,

such as misconduct.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of reference (b), the Board concludes that
Petitioner’s request warrants partial relief.

The Board concludes that based upon his overall record of service, and
current Department of the Navy policy as established in reference (b),
that relief in the form of his narrative reason for separation be
changed to “secretarial authority,” SPD code be changed to “JFF1,” and
reentry code be changed to “RE-1J.” Additionally, that the separation
authority be changed to read “MILPERSMAN 1910-164.”

The Board is not willing to change his general characterization of
service. In this regard, the Board noted that he admitted to
participating in homosexual acts under aggravating circumstances that
have an adverse impact on morale and discipline. In his case, he
engaged in homosexual acts with another service member who was
assigned to the same ship. Although they were not assigned to
military duties involving direct supervision by one over the other, a
superior to subordinate relationship existed, as stated in the Navy
Discharge Review Board review on 2 November 1992, which is sufficient
even under current standards to warrant a general discharge. Under 10
United States Code (U.S.C.) 654 (Repeal), the Board can grant a
request to upgrade a discharge based on homosexuality when two
conditions are met: (1) the original discharge was based solely on
“don't ask don’t tell” (DADT) or similar policy in place prior to
enactment of DADT and (2) there were no aggravating factors such as
misconduct. In this case, the Board found misconduct and aggravating
factors. In view of the above, the Board directs the following

partial corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 16
June 1992, his narrative reason for discharge was “secretarial
authority,” SPD code be changed to “JFF,” and that he was assigned an
“RE-1gd" reentry code. Additionally, that the separation authority be
changed to read “MILPERSMAN 1910-164," and that he be issued a new
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214).

: a
SUN
Docket No: 5584-14

b. That no further relief be granted.

c. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

d. That, upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs be
informed that Petitioner's application was received by the Board on 7
April, 2014.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was

present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's proceedings in

the above entitled matter.

T. J. REED
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of
the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

ROBERT : ‘NEILL
Executive director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4368 14

    Original file (NR4368 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his “RE-4” (not recommended for retention) reentry code be changed per reference (b). The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 April 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5394 14

    Original file (NR5394 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-4 reenlistment code be upgraded to an RE-1J reenlistment code. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 May 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board concludes...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1774 14

    Original file (NR1774 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    654 (Repeal) Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case summary (3) Subject's naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her general characterization of service, separation program designator (SPD) “HRA1”, RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code, and narrative reason for separation “HOMOSEXUAL ACT” be changed per reference (b). It...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04997 12

    Original file (04997 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that he receive full or half separation pay aS a result of his discharge. On 1 November 2010, the Naval Discharge Review Board changed his characterization of service to honorable but did not change the narrative reason “homosexual admission” for his discharge. The Board concludes that based upon his record of service and current Department of the Navy policy as established...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0323 14

    Original file (NR0323 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her RE-4 (not recommended for. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman and Exnicios and Ms. Montgomery, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6346-13

    Original file (NR6346-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his narrative reason for separation “Discharge (Homosexual Conduct)”, Separation Program Designator (SPD) “HRB1”, and “RE-4” (not recommended for retention) reentry code, be changed per reference (b). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman and Exnicios, and Ms. Montgomery, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00715-11

    Original file (00715-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SoN Docket No: O00715-11 27 October 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW - NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board concludes that based upon his overall record of service and current Department of the Navy policy as established in reference (b), that relief in the form of his narrative reason for separation be changed to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4555 14

    Original file (NR4555 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her “under honorable conditions (general)” characterization of service, narrative reason for separation “discharge involuntarily-homosexuality- admission (administrative discharge board required but waived),” “RE-4” (not recommended for retention) reentry code, and separation program designator (SPD) “HRB1” be changed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4493 14

    Original file (NR4493 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Zoe the Board, consisting of i eviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 May 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. However, on 18 February 1986, an administrative board convened for the purpose of considering allegations that Petitioner had demonstrated homosexual conduct. The separation authority approved and directed a general discharge due to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4664 14

    Original file (NR4664 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his “general discharge under honorable conditions” be changed to “honorable,” per reference (b). The Board, consisting RR es eee ee reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 April 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...